Press "Enter" to skip to content

One Path or Two?

One Path or Two?
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

One Path or Two?

A story of humility, brotherhood, and hearts adorned with faith

1.0x
1.0x

Imam Ibrāhīm al-Nakhaʿī had lost sight in one eye. His student, Sulaymān ibn Mihrān al-Aʿmash, had weak eyesight of his own. One day, the two of them were walking together along one of the streets of Kūfah, on their way to the mosque.

As they walked side by side, Imam al-Nakhaʿī turned to his student with an unusual request.

✦ ✦ ✦

A Request on the Road

Ibrāhīm al-Nakhaʿī: “O Sulaymān, would you take one path while I take another? I fear that if we pass together by the foolish among them, they may say, ‘A one-eyed man leading a weak-sighted man,’ and thus backbite us and incur sin.”

It was a strange thing to ask — two friends and companions in faith, parting ways on the road to avoid becoming, without ever intending it, the cause of someone else’s sin. But al-Aʿmash, ever sharp, saw an opening for a different kind of reward.

Al-Aʿmash: “O Abū ʿImrān, what harm is there if we are rewarded while they bear the sin?”

It is a tempting logic. If people choose to mock or backbite, the sin is theirs alone — and the two scholars, patient and wronged, would only be rewarded for what they endured. Why walk apart at all?

Imam al-Nakhaʿī’s answer reframed the entire question.

Ibrāhīm al-Nakhaʿī: “Glory be to Allah! Rather, that we remain safe and that they remain safe is better than our being rewarded while they incur sin.”

“That we remain safe and that they remain safe is better than our being rewarded while they incur sin.”

— Ibrāhīm al-Nakhaʿī
✦ ✦ ✦

Hearts Adorned With Faith

These were hearts adorned with faith — hearts that soared heavenward and carried their owners toward the highest gardens of Paradise. Al-Nakhaʿī did not simply calculate what was permissible for himself, or content himself with the fact that any sin committed against him would not be his own burden to carry. He looked further: toward the wellbeing of people he did not even know, people who might never learn that a scholar had quietly changed his route through Kūfah for their sake.

That is the deeper meaning behind his reply. It would have cost him nothing to keep walking beside his student and simply absorb whatever mockery came his way — he would even have earned reward for the patience. But he chose the harder, quieter path: preventing the sin from happening at all, so that both he and the people around him could remain safe from it.

This is a heart that had absorbed and understood the saying of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ:

Hadith of the Prophet ﷺ

“None of you truly believes until he loves for his brother what he loves for himself.”

— Anas ibn Mālik (RA), narrated in Al-Bukhari and Muslim

Al-Nakhaʿī did not want reward at the expense of a stranger’s sin, any more than he would want it for himself. He loved safety for others the same way he loved it for his own soul — and so he chose, without being asked, to protect people he would likely never meet again.

A Reflection

It is easy to measure our actions only by what we stand to gain — reward earned, patience rewarded, wrongs endured nobly. Al-Nakhaʿī’s answer asks something harder of us: to measure our actions by what they cost others, even when we ourselves have done nothing wrong. Sometimes the more generous choice is not the one that earns us the most, but the one that spares someone else a sin they don’t even know they’re about to commit.

A story of two of the great scholars among the Tābiʿūn of Kūfah

وَٱللَّهُ أَعْلَمُ — And Allah knows best

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

AsSiddique Post A Votingmap company (VMAP Inc.). Hatim Hegab Production